It seems impossible, or not need to remind this to a politician. Unfortunately have fallen into such a state of meanness slips them all. His breed, because they are and many know, negotiate for them or for those who have taken the position, see Rajoy and Camps. Supposed to be responsible citizens, but that dream is pure mockery in our times.

And it is having to remind Mr. Vidal-Quadras its mission and even one of the basic principles of democracy, is really embarrassing. For me it was a real disappointment, because he was a decent person. However, the facts show only that is of the same ilk as their peers. Certainly endeavored to give an image like any good politician worth his salt, has its website and even blog whose address alejoresponde.com invites us to ask. In the same way gives interviews to keep the same line. What happens is that we are slaves of our actions and today can not hide everything, however much they try to silence us, right sir? Vidal-Quadras?.

That picture immaculate duty, how much effort it costs to maintain, usually collapse on merit. He who is a bastard and admits, is a son of a bitch and go. But claiming to be the Immaculate Conception and then hurts you is a traitor of the worst kind. This is how we might consider to Mr. Alejo Vidal-Quadras, whose efforts to disguise and hide their acts in the distance could be considered almost insulting. This MEP chair of the conciliation committee Telecom Package, liberticidal set a negotiating group, with malice aforethought, to defend our rights by preventing the entry of other components annoying. "Too risk", no plans were to go wrong or rather those of others. Unsurprisingly for such suspicious movements, the negotiation was a pantomime, as much as this man was telling reporters days before , how sensitive he was to net neutrality. Then clear that we must take into account that this is a negotiation. FREEDOM NO TRADES! Mr Vidal-Quadras. What happened was that gave it directly, otherwise it would be too dirty right? The fact is that your little credibility as public representative has blown. But before you take the wind, I want to ask one last question. Whom to defend you? Alejo responds.

That's the conclusion to be drawn after the meeting of the Conciliation Committee. This committee elected three representatives to negotiate with the European Council the final text for the Telecoms Package. In this packet are elucidated stuff like communication privacy or net neutrality , come on, what some crazy considered fundamental. The components of the Spanish trio are Alejo Vidal-Quadras (EPP), the German Herbert Reul (PPE) and France's Catherine Trautmann. The first is well known by all, and their feedback on these issues are not anything to write. The second component, promoter censorship law in your country, is the president of the Parliamentary Industry Committee, is also a defender of multinationals as well show their ratings in this field. The thing look bad, but we still have the third component. French Socialist, was speaker of the reports that constitute the so-called "Telecoms Package" amendments primarily responsible for the torpedo, that is number one enemy of freedom on the Internet, transmission belt wettest dreams little Napoleon. That is neither socialist nor na, as always.

The meeting should be cracking. Trautmann MEP seems that released that net neutrality should not be treated in a law like this. Perhaps it would be better in the waste collection Mrs. Trautmann? Of course there was no agreement, but was configured as one negotiating team that presided over the committee at that time, the other being the ITRE committee chairman and head of the board, and the other for being the presenter. Vidal-Quadras also prevented the inclusion of other components of the committee for being "too risky". Who Mr Vidal-Quadras?
These three parliamentarians have the future of our liberties in his hands and hardly defend them against an EU Council rejection and impose no restrictions on the fundamental rights and freedoms of users without a court order, unless security is threatened public. Sure, the council defended interests different from those of citizens, as it is composed of the ministers of telecommunications, ie industry in each country. So the result of the "negotiation" is very predictable between no oxen gored.
It is in these moments when I envy the sense of responsibility of American politicians, however much many they fill the mouth insulting USA. And now I wonder, how and with what criteria were elected these representatives in Europe? Moreover, what the fuck is this the europarliament defends not who would you choose?
What can you do? Well now send mails to MEPs, especially Mr. Alejo Vidal-Quadras, to reconsider their position.

Some dogs bite the hands that feed him. The Spanish proverb has such wisdom that even if they spend the years and centuries, the same behaviors that continue to reflect faithfully complaint today. So MEPs behave if they approve the Amendments Torpedo against Internet freedom.

These amendments are included within the Telecoms Package, a series of laws that will be voted on next month. As always the sly in a series of measures, such as thieves who take advantage of darkness to commit their crimes. Why behave like lords MEPs? Or is it that they are embarrassed to know that they will vote this:

• Eliminate or reduce the speed of P2P, especially to prevent alleged violations of "intellectual property", which would constitute a violation of the principle of net neutrality.
• Cooperation between ISPs and content producers to judge what content is legal and what not.
• Obligation for service providers, to control and warning email to users when downloading illegal content.
• Installation and enforcement of software on PCs to detect violations of intellectual property.

It seems to protect the rights of the authors will take to trample the rights of all citizens, those who pay his salary. Anyway, no one will say anything, we are sheep. Many will say that it's okay, but really spends a lot of cases of violation of fundamental rights such as privacy and data communications, the privacy, freedom of expression, or the competence of judges. Who is the SGAE to have my data and intercept my communications? What kind of critters are forcibly installing anything on my computer that nefarious hackers? Why should we reduce the speed of connections, plunging us into underdevelopment, to maintain this bunch of parasites? What right does the SGAE to close sites by interested criterion? Is that now a private entity judges the freedom of expression? Will they close my blog by just wrote lines? We only ask that you respect such basic things as:

• The net neutrality.
• Only the judges can decide on the legality of the content, and never another entity as an ISP, a management of copyright or software.
• Only the judges can decide on the closure of a website.

I believe that protecting freedom in the network and our fundamental rights is to fight for our future, who do not believe and can see the result of giving up those in favor of governments in the BGP protocol used by the U.S. Security Agency, or just stop by Cuba, China or read some history about dictatorships. So I ask you difundáis this information and you join any initiative to stop this shame, as the Amendment Torpedo Group on Facebook. In any case if fortunately the amendments do not go forward, national laws shall govern in these matters and here in Spain and we have gotten bent the ZP and the rest of us living henchmen. This is a fight melee trench to trench, shoulder to shoulder , defending our rights against those who would do it for us. Who serve the lords MEPs to bite our hands which feed them?