A vessel with fire 36 pounds

It seems incredible or not need to remind this to a politician. Unfortunately they have fallen into such a state of villainy sliding them everything. Caste, because they are and many know, negotiate for them or who have been given the job, see Rajoy and Camps. They are supposed to charge citizens, but that dream is pure mockery of our times.

And is that having to remind Mr. Vidal-Quadras its role and even one of the basic principles of democracy, it's really embarrassing. For me it was a real disappointment, because he was a decent person. However the facts only show, which is of the same ilk as their peers. I certainly endeavored to give an image like any good politician worth his salt has its website and even blog whose address alejoresponde.com invites us to ask. Likewise gives interviews to maintain the same line. What happens is that we are slaves of our actions and today you can not hide everything, however much they try to silence us, Lord, what do you Vidal-Quadras ?.

This immaculate image of duty, how much effort it costs to maintain, usually collapse on merit. Which is a bastard and admits, is a motherfucker and go. But claiming to be the Immaculate Conception and then you harm, is a traitor of the worst kind. This is how we could consider Mr. Alejo Vidal-Quadras, whose efforts to disguise and conceal their actions in the distance could be considered almost insulting. This MEP chairing the Conciliation Committee of Telecom Package, configured a freedom-negotiating group, with malice aforethought, to defend our rights preventing the entry of other troublesome components. "Too risk" were not to twist their plans or rather those of others. As expected for such suspicious movements, the negotiation was a pantomime, much as this gentleman was saying days before reporters , how sensitive he was to net neutrality. Then clear that we must take into account that this is a negotiation. FREEDOM NO TRADES! Mr Vidal-Quadras. What happened was that gave it directly, otherwise it would be too dirty right? The fact is that his little credit as a public representative has blown. But before he takes the wind, I want to ask one last question. Who has defended you? Alejo answered.

17.10.2009 - 15:10 | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink | Tracklink |

That's the conclusion to be drawn after the meeting of the conciliation committee. This committee elected three representatives to negotiate with the Council of Europe the final text for the Telecom Package. In this packet stuff like privacy of communications or are elucidated net neutrality , come on, what some crazy considered fundamental rights. The components of the trio is the Spanish Alejo Vidal-Quadras (EPP), German Herbert Reul (PPE) and France's Catherine Trautmann. The first is well known by all, and their feedback on these issues are nothing to brag about. The second component, a promoter censorship law in your country, is the chairman of the parliamentary committee of Industry, ie also advocate for multinationals as well show your feedback in the field. The thing look bad, but we have the third component. The French socialist, was speaker of the reports that constitute the so-called "Telecoms Package" primarily responsible for the torpedo amendments, ie number one enemy of freedom on the Internet, belt of the wettest dreams of the little Napoleon. It is neither socialist nor na, as always.

The meeting should be cracking. It seems that the Trautmann MEP let that net neutrality should not be treated in such a law. Perhaps it would be better in waste collection Mrs Trautmann? Of course there was no agreement, but the negotiating team was configured as one who presided over the committee at that time, the other being the chairman of the ITRE committee and responsible for the policy, and the other to be the rapporteur. Vidal-Quadras also prevented the inclusion of other components of the committee for being "too risky". Who Mr. Vidal-Quadras?
These three MPs hold the future of our freedoms in his hands and hardly defend them against an EU Council already rejected not restrict the fundamental rights and freedoms of users without a judicial order except when security is threatened public. Sure, they said council defended the different interests of citizens, as it is composed of the ministers of telecommunications, ie industry in each country. So the result of "negotiation" is very predictable: Between no oxen horns.
It is at these times that I envy the sense of responsibility of American politicians, much as many are mouthful insulting USA. And now I wonder, how and with what criteria these representatives were elected in Europe? Moreover, what the fuck is this the europarliament that does not defend those who choose him?
What can be done? Well now send mails to MEPs, especially to Mr. Alejo Vidal-Quadras, to reconsider their position.

30.09.2009 - 15:15 | Comments & Trackbacks (2) | Permalink | Tracklink |

Some dogs bite the hands that feed him. The Spanish proverb holds such wisdom that even if they spend the years and centuries, the same human behaviors that complaint was still reflect faithfully today. So MEPs will behave if they pass the Torpedo Amendments against Internet freedom.

These amendments are included within the Telecoms Package, a series of laws that next month will be voted. As always surreptitiously into another series of measures, such as thieves take advantage of the darkness to commit their crimes. Why MEPs behave like gentlemen? Or is that they are embarrassed to know that they will vote this:

  • Eliminate or reduce the speed of P2P, especially to prevent alleged violations of "intellectual property", which would constitute a violation of the principle of net neutrality.
  • Cooperation between ISPs and content producers to judge what content is legal and what not.
  • Obligation for service providers, control and warning email to users when downloading illegal content.
  • Installing and enforcement of software on PCs to detect violations of intellectual property.

It seems to protect the rights of authors will take advantage to trample the rights of all citizens, those who pay his salary. Anyway, nobody will say anything, we are sheep. Many will say that nothing happens, but actually spends a lot when fundamental rights are violated as privacy of communications and data, privacy, freedom of expression, or the competence of judges. Who is the SGAE to have my data and intercept my communications? What kind of vermin are to install by force anything on my computer which vile hackers? Why should slow connections, plunging us into underdevelopment, to keep this bunch of parasites? What right does the SGAE to close sites by interested criterion? Is now a private entity considers freedom of expression? Are To Close my blog by lines just wrote? We only ask that such basic things as the following are met:

  • The net neutrality.
  • Only judges may decide on the legality of the contents, and never another entity such as an ISP, a management entity copyright or software.
  • Only judges may decide on the closure of a website.

I think that protect freedom in the network and our fundamental rights is to fight for our future, who do not believe and can see the result of giving up these for governments in the BGP protocol used by the Security Agency US, or just stop by Cuba, China or read some history about dictatorships. So I ask you difundáis this information and you to join any initiative to stop this shamelessness, as the Group Amendment Torpedo Facebook. In any case if fortunately the amendments do not go forward, national laws will be those that govern these issues and here in Spain and we have gotten bent the ZP and the rest of us living minions. This is a fight melee trench to trench, shoulder to shoulder , defending our rights against those who would do it for us. Who do they MEPs gentlemen to bite our hands that feed them?

30.08.2008 - 13:28 | Comments & Trackbacks (6) | Permalink | Tracklink |