A ship with 36 pounds of fire

It seems impossible, or not need to remind this to a politician. Unfortunately they have fallen into such a state of meanness sliding them all. Caste, because they are many and we know, negotiate for them or who have been given the job, and see Rajoy Camps. They are supposed to responsible citizens, but that dream is pure mockery of our times.

And having to remind Mr Vidal-Quadras its mission and even one of the basic principles of democracy, it's really embarrassing. For me it has been a real disappointment, because he was a decent person. But the facts show only that is of the same ilk as their peers. Certainly endeavored to give an image like any good politician worth his salt has his website and even blog whose address alejoresponde.com invites us to ask. Likewise gives interviews to keep the same line. What happens is that we are slaves of our actions and today you can not hide everything, however much they try to silence us, right? Mr. Vidal-Quadras?.

This immaculate image of duty, how much effort it costs to maintain, usually fall apart on its own merits. Which is a bastard and admits, is a motherfucker and is already. But claiming to be the Immaculate Conception and then hurts you is a traitor of the worst kind. This is how we could consider Mr. Alejo Vidal-Quadras, whose efforts to disguise and hide their acts in the distance could be considered almost insulting. This MEP chair of the conciliation committee of the Telecom Package liberticidal configured a negotiating group, with malice aforethought, to defend our rights preventing the entry of other troublesome components. "Too risk", no plans were to go wrong or rather those of others. Unsurprisingly for such suspicious movements, negotiation was a pantomime, as much as this man was telling reporters days before , which was sensitive to net neutrality. Then clear that we must take into account that this is a negotiation. FREEDOM NO TRADES! Mr Vidal-Quadras. What happened was that gave it directly, otherwise it would be too dirty right? The fact is that your little credit as a public speaker has blown. But before the wind takes it, I want to ask one last question. Who to defend yourself? Alejo responds.

17.10.2009 - 15:10 | Comments & Trackbacks (0) | Permalink | Tracklink |

That's the conclusion to be drawn after the meeting of the Conciliation Committee. This committee elected three representatives to negotiate with the European Council the final text for the Telecom Package. In that packet stuff like privacy of communications are clarified or net neutrality , come on, what some crazy considered fundamental rights. The components of the Spanish trio are Alejo Vidal-Quadras (EPP), the German Herbert Reul (PPE) and the French Catherine Trautmann. The first is well known by all, and their feedback on these issues are nothing to rave about. The second component, promoter of a censorship law in your country, is the chairman of the parliamentary committee of industry, ie also advocate for multinational as well show their ratings in this field. Things look bad, but we still have the third component. The French socialist, was speaker of the reports are called "Telecoms Package" primarily responsible for the torpedo amendments, that is number one enemy of freedom on the Internet, transmission belt of the wettest dreams of little Napoleon. That is neither socialist nor na, as always.

The meeting should be cracking. It appears that the Trautmann MEP released that net neutrality should not be treated in such a law. Perhaps it would be better in the waste collection Mrs. Trautmann? Of course there was no agreement, but the negotiating team was configured as one who presided over the committee at that time, the other being the president of the ITRE committee and responsible for the policy, and the other being the rapporteur. Vidal-Quadras also prevented the inclusion of other components of the committee for being "too risky." Who Mr Vidal-Quadras?
These three MPs have the future of our liberties in his hands and hardly defend them against an EU Council already rejected not restrict the fundamental rights and freedoms of users without a court, except when threatened by security public. Of course, the council defended the different interests of citizens, as it is composed of the ministers of telecommunications, ie industry in each country. So the result of the "negotiation" is very predictable: from no oxen gored.
It is in these moments when I envy the sense of responsibility of American politicians, much as many they fill the mouth insulting USA. And now I wonder, how and with what criteria were elected these representatives in Europe? Moreover, what the fuck is this the europarliament not choose who defends him?
What can you do? Well now send mails to MEPs, especially to Mr. Alejo Vidal-Quadras, to reconsider their position.

30.09.2009 - 15:15 | Comments & Trackbacks (2) | Permalink | Tracklink |

Some dogs bite the hands that feed him. The Spanish proverb holds that although such wisdom as the years pass and centuries, the same human behaviors that continue to reflect faithfully complaint today. So behave if MEPs approve Torpedo Amendments against Internet freedom.

These amendments are included within the Telecoms Package, a series of laws that next month they will vote. As always surreptitiously within a series of measures, such as thieves who take advantage of the darkness to commit their crimes. Why MEPs behave like gentlemen? Or is it embarrassing to know that they will vote this:

  • Eliminate or reduce the speed of P2P, especially to prevent alleged violations of "intellectual property", which would constitute a violation of the principle of net neutrality.
  • Cooperation between ISPs and content producers to judge what content is legal and which are not.
  • Obligation on the part of service providers to monitor and warn users by email when illegal content is downloaded.
  • Installation and enforcement of software on PCs to detect violations of intellectual property.

It seems to protect the rights of authors will take to trample the rights of all citizens, those who pay his salary. Anyway, no one will say anything, we are sheep. Many will say that nothing happens, but actually happens a lot when basic rights are violated as the privacy of communications and data, privacy, freedom of speech, or the competence of judges. Who is the SGAE to have my data and intercept my communications? What kind of critters are forcibly install anything on my computer which nefarious hackers? Why should we slow connections, plunging us into underdevelopment, to keep this bunch of parasites? What right does the SGAE to close sites by interested criterion? Is now a private entity judges the freedom of expression? Were To Close my blog for the lines just wrote? We just ask that things as basic as you respect the following:

  • The net neutrality.
  • Only the judges can decide on the legality of the content, and never another entity as an ISP, a managing body of copyright or software.
  • Only the judges can decide on the closure of a website.

I believe that protecting freedom in the network and our fundamental rights is to fight for our future, who do not believe and can see the result of giving up these in favor of governments in the BGP protocol used by the Security Agency USA, or just stop by Cuba, China or read some history about dictatorships. So I ask you difundáis this information and you join any initiative to stop this shamelessness, as Amendment Torpedo Group on Facebook. In any case if fortunately the amendments do not go forward, the national laws which will govern these issues and here in Spain and we have gotten bent the ZP and the rest of us living henchmen. This is a fight melee trench to trench, shoulder to shoulder , defending our rights against those who would do it for us. Who do they MEPs gentlemen to bite our hands, you feed them?

30.08.2008 - 13:28 | Comments & Trackbacks (6) | Permalink | Tracklink |