Sorry for not giving more news, as I leave this documentary about copyright in Spain. Recommended for everyone, say it is compulsory reading for understanding the situation in the country:

Indeed denúnciala to the European Commission and breed you claim has fallen from me.

This is the certified mail receipt, requesting the implementation of measures against monopolistic activity has identified the National Competition Commission in the SGAE and cursed sisters. According to the commission these insatiable harpies would be in breach of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to allow a situation of dominance. Our complaint is attached to that carried out by lawyers David Bravo and Javier de la Cueva , being a procedure without costs.
Actually if you have a coast, less than 3 €, registered mail and the envelope. Insignificant to the satisfaction of participating in the sinking of the SGAE and the fact denounce the Spanish state for allowing such a monopoly. It's a very clever attack. We have nothing to lose and much to gain.
This is a war with many fronts tow must be given in all cases. David and Javier as well as other many being charged with the responsibility of defending our rights, it is time to put together shoulder to shoulder with them. Complaint without costs to the SGAE . Teddy! There goes my gun!

This ship joins the fleet of Admiral Place and form a battle line and wait orders. The Admiralty has declared war on the SGAE and the Minister of Culture with SS.

We knew we were many, but this time we are coordinated. The boldness of the enemy will be his undoing, believed to attack a rival disorganized. What happens is that we are a diffuse target, and therefore potentially dangerous. They knew who they were facing. Well now we have upset and will suffer greatly, should leave roughly handled, you have the audacity to make them pay. They should be clarito who can not be retried.

Statement "In defense of fundamental rights on the Internet"

Before inclusion in the Draft Law on Sustainable economy of legislative changes affecting the free exercise of freedom of expression, information and the right of access to culture through the Internet, journalists, bloggers, users, professionals and developers Internet express our firm opposition to the project, and declare that:

1. The copyright can not be above the fundamental rights of citizens, including the right to privacy, security, presumption of innocence, effective judicial protection and freedom of expression.
2. The suspension of fundamental rights is and must remain a matter for the judicial l. Not a close without judgment. This blueprint, contrary to the provisions of Article 20.5 of the Constitution, put into the hands of a non-judicial body, a body under the Ministry of Culture, the power to keep Spanish citizens access to any website.
3. The new legislation will create legal uncertainty around the Spanish technology sector, damaging one of the few areas of development and future of our economy, hindering the creation of enterprises by introducing barriers to competition and slowing its international expansion.
4. The new proposed legislation threatens creativity and hinder cultural creation. With Internet and new technologies have democratized the creation and release of contents of any kind, no longer come predominantly from the traditional cultural industries, but on multiple from different sources.
5. asociadas a sus creaciones. The authors, like all workers are entitled to stand on their own creative ideas, business models and activities associated with their creations. Trying to hold with legislative changes to an outdated industry who can not adapt to this new environment is neither fair nor realistic. If your business model is based on the control of the copies of the works and the Internet is not possible without violating fundamental rights, should look for another model.
6. We believe that cultural industries need to survive modern alternatives, effective, credible and affordable to adapt to new social practices, rather than limitations so disproportionate as to be ineffective in that they are pursuing.
7. Internet should function freely and without interference from groups that seek to perpetuate obsolete business models and make it impossible that human knowledge remains free.
8. We urge the Government to guarantee the neutrality law of the Network in Spain, to any pressure that may occur as a framework for developing a sustainable economy for the future.
9. We propose a real reform of intellectual property rights aimed at an end: back to society the knowledge, promote the public domain and limit abuses of copyright organizations.
10. In a democracy, laws and amendments should be adopted after due debate and consultation with all parties involved. It is unacceptable that legislative changes are made ​​that affect fundamental rights in a non-organic law that deals with another matter.

Some dogs bite the hands that feed him. The Spanish proverb holds that while such wisdom to pass the years and centuries, the same behaviors that continue to reflect faithfully complaint today. MEPs will behave well if they pass the Torpedo Amendments against Internet freedom.

These amendments are included within the Telecoms Package, a series of laws to be voted on next month. As always surreptitiously within a series of measures such as the thieves who take advantage of the darkness to commit their crimes. Why behave like lords MEPs? Or they are embarrassed to know that they will vote this:

• Eliminate or reduce the speed of P2P, especially to prevent alleged violations of "intellectual property" which would constitute a violation of the principle of net neutrality.
• Cooperation between ISPs and content producers to judge what content is legal and which not.
• Obligation for service providers, to monitor and advise by email to users when they download illegal content.
• Installation and enforcement of software on PCs to detect violations of intellectual property.

It seems to protect the rights of authors will take to trample the rights of all citizens, those who pay his salary. Anyway, nobody will say anything, we are sheep. Many will say that nothing happens, but actually spends a lot of cases of violation of basic rights such as privacy and data communications, the privacy, freedom of expression, or the competence of judges. Who is the SGAE to have my data and intercept my communications? What kind of vermin are to install by force anything on my computer which nefarious hackers? Why should we reduce the speed of connections, plunging us in underdevelopment, to keep this bunch of parasites? What right does the SGAE to close sites by interested criterion? Is now a private entity judges the freedom of expression? Will they close my blog along the lines I just wrote? We just ask that you respect such basic things as:

• The net neutrality.
• Only judges may decide on the legality of the contents, and never another entity as an ISP, a management of copyright or software.
• Only judges may decide on the closure of a website.

I have to protect freedom in the network and our fundamental rights is to fight for our future, who do not believe so you can see the result of giving up these governments for the BGP protocol used by the U.S. National Security Agency, or just stop by Cuba, China or read some history about dictatorships. So I ask you difundáis this information and you join any initiative to stop this shame, as the Amendment Torpedo Group on Facebook. In any case if the amendments fortunately not thrive, national laws shall govern in these matters and here in Spain and we have gotten bent ZP and the rest of us minions living. This is a melee fighting, trench to trench, side by side , defending our rights against those who should do it for us. Who serve the lords MEPs to bite our hands which feed them?